Qglk I have very good working relationship with West Bengal govt: Governor
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre and others on a plea over the non-payment of emoluments to the resident doctors pursuing PG diploma courses across employees state insurance corporation hospitals and colleges. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah issued notice to the Centre and others on the plea. The petition, which also raised the issue of disparities in the stipends, said the aggrieved doctors include those enrolled in a post-MBBS diploma, Diplomate of National Board DNB , post-diploma DNB and Doctorate of National Board DrNB . Also ReadKumbh stampede: SC refuses to hear PIL The petition, filed by advocate Tanvi Dubey, said the doctors challenged the unjust and arbitrary act of discrimination between the post-graduate diploma resident doctors and doctorate of medicine MD and master of surgery MS students at ESIC colleges and hospitals. The usual expenses of the <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.it>tappo stanley</a> DNB candidates are almost similar to that <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.de>stanley trinkflaschen</a> of MD/MS or any other candidates. However, it is appalling to note that the DNB candidates are not getting any kind of allowances unlike the MD/MS candida <a href=https://www.stanley1913.com.es>stanley taza</a> tes, the petition said. The plea said doctors were aggrieved by the arbitrary and unjust actions of the respondents due to the payment of a lower stipend amount without allowances. The respondents in the matter are the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment, National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences, the di Xtvj INDIA bloc wants to rob reservation of SCs, STs, OBCs to appease Muslims: Nadda
New Delhi: Social activist Gautam Navlakha, accused of having links to Maoists and Pakistan spy agency ISI, on Friday withdrew from the Supreme Court his application seeking to be shifted to Delhi from Mumbai under house arrest. Navlakha is under house arr <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de>stanley germany</a> est in Mumbai in conne <a href=https://www.stanleys-cups.us>stanley cup website</a> ction with the Elgar Parishad-Maoist link case. On November 10 last year, the 70-year-old was allowed by <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk>stanley cup uk</a> the apex court to be placed under house arrest owing to his deteriorating health. His application, seeking to be shifted to Delhi, came up for hearing on Friday before a bench of Justices K M Joseph and B V Nagarathna. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed Navlakha application. Senior advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the activist, told the bench that Navlakha will look for some other place to stay in Mumbai. She said she would withdraw the application. Also ReadAdani row: SC refuses to accept Centres suggestions on expert panel in sealed cover Dismissed as withdrawn, the bench said. Trashing NIA apprehensions, the top court had on November 18 last year ordered that Navlakha be placed under house arrest without fail within 24 hours. The bench, however, had ordered some additional security measures to be put in place at the building where Navlakha was to be kept under house arrest. Prior to that, on November 15 last year, the apex court had cleared the hurdle for his release from Navi Mumbai Taloja prison, where he was
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response from the Centre and others on a plea over the non-payment of emoluments to the resident doctors pursuing PG diploma courses across employees state insurance corporation hospitals and colleges. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah issued notice to the Centre and others on the plea. The petition, which also raised the issue of disparities in the stipends, said the aggrieved doctors include those enrolled in a post-MBBS diploma, Diplomate of National Board DNB , post-diploma DNB and Doctorate of National Board DrNB . Also ReadKumbh stampede: SC refuses to hear PIL The petition, filed by advocate Tanvi Dubey, said the doctors challenged the unjust and arbitrary act of discrimination between the post-graduate diploma resident doctors and doctorate of medicine MD and master of surgery MS students at ESIC colleges and hospitals. The usual expenses of the <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.it>tappo stanley</a> DNB candidates are almost similar to that <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.de>stanley trinkflaschen</a> of MD/MS or any other candidates. However, it is appalling to note that the DNB candidates are not getting any kind of allowances unlike the MD/MS candida <a href=https://www.stanley1913.com.es>stanley taza</a> tes, the petition said. The plea said doctors were aggrieved by the arbitrary and unjust actions of the respondents due to the payment of a lower stipend amount without allowances. The respondents in the matter are the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment, National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences, the di Xtvj INDIA bloc wants to rob reservation of SCs, STs, OBCs to appease Muslims: Nadda
New Delhi: Social activist Gautam Navlakha, accused of having links to Maoists and Pakistan spy agency ISI, on Friday withdrew from the Supreme Court his application seeking to be shifted to Delhi from Mumbai under house arrest. Navlakha is under house arr <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de>stanley germany</a> est in Mumbai in conne <a href=https://www.stanleys-cups.us>stanley cup website</a> ction with the Elgar Parishad-Maoist link case. On November 10 last year, the 70-year-old was allowed by <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk>stanley cup uk</a> the apex court to be placed under house arrest owing to his deteriorating health. His application, seeking to be shifted to Delhi, came up for hearing on Friday before a bench of Justices K M Joseph and B V Nagarathna. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed Navlakha application. Senior advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the activist, told the bench that Navlakha will look for some other place to stay in Mumbai. She said she would withdraw the application. Also ReadAdani row: SC refuses to accept Centres suggestions on expert panel in sealed cover Dismissed as withdrawn, the bench said. Trashing NIA apprehensions, the top court had on November 18 last year ordered that Navlakha be placed under house arrest without fail within 24 hours. The bench, however, had ordered some additional security measures to be put in place at the building where Navlakha was to be kept under house arrest. Prior to that, on November 15 last year, the apex court had cleared the hurdle for his release from Navi Mumbai Taloja prison, where he was
0