1 month ago
#801488 Quote
Jgud White House says health insurance needs to fully cover condoms, other over-the-counter birth control
Boeing may need to take a forward loss on its 787 programme if it must further trim production or if long-term demand dries up.On 27 January, chief financial officer Greg Smith warned of t <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley botella</a> he possible charge, which could be required under Boeings programme accounting method of reporting programme costs. If we are required to further reduce the accounting quantity and-or production rates, or experience other factors that could result in lower margin, the programme could reach forward loss in future periods,  Smith says.Source: Max Kingsley-Jones/FlightGlobalEtihad Airways Boeing 787-10 landing  The 787 programme has near break-even gross margins due to the previously announced reduction rates and programme accounting quantity,  he adds.Under programme accounting, Boeing tallies the expected entire cost of a programme, then expenses portions of that cost against deliveries. Fewer deliveries, or slower production rates, affect reported profitability.At the end of September 2020, Boeings 787 programme accounting was based on the expectation of 1,500 787 deliveries over the life of production. The figure was 1,600 at the end of 2019.Boeing is also cutting 787 produ <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley cup</a> ction to five jets monthly, down from 14 in 2019.In a 26 January research report, JPMorgan calls a 787 future charge  possible.  Boeing took a $6.5 billion loss on its 777X in the f <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley spain</a> ourth quarter of 2020.Taken together, those charges highlight  the degree to which the 737 Max will be almost the sole contributor to  Boeings Ikcj AVALON: G600 makes downunder debut
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on聽bangordailynewsJohn M. Crisp is an opinion columnist for Tribune News Service.I like public schools for the same reason that William Faulkner hated the post office.Before Faulkner became the great Southern novelist, he hired on as the postmaster at the University of Mississippi. By all accounts he was an indifferent pos <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.de>stanley isolierkanne</a> tmaster, opening the P.O. when he felt like it and never letting the U.S. mail interfere with his hunting and golf. Students complained that the P.O. motto under Faulkners regime should be  Never put the mail up on time. Af <a href=https://www.stanleywebsite.us>stanley website</a> ter two years Faulkner and the Postal Service had had enough of each other. In a fit of wounded dignity, Faulkner resigned. He said that as long as he lived in a capitalist society, he expected to have his life  influenced by the demands of moneyed people.  But, <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.us>stanley cup</a>   he sniffed,  I will be damned if I propose to be at the beck and call of every itinerant scoundrel who has two cents to invest in a postage stamp. But thats what I like about the post office. Can we think of any American institution that better serves egalitarianism and democracy than the post office  What could be more American than our early determination 鈥?Ben Franklin was the first postmaster general 鈥?to provide the same quality service for the same low price to all Americans, regardless of their economic status Public scho
0